The reality is, all is not as it seems

David Paulides makes it known that he does not suggest that Sasquatch has anything to do with the missing persons in and around provincial parks. This is left up to the reader to determine for themselves, but I have to caution, the evidence is not just merely speculation. David Paulides makes a good case to steer the reader's attention in the direction of the unknown possibilities, and allows the evidence to make the determined factual reasoning that can only conclude one thing; that Sasquatch abductions are a very strong possibility.

However, there is still one element that remains missing in David Paulides investigations and without this one question answered, all these cases will remain shrouded in mystery. You cannot solve a case to its conclusion without having a motive. In order to understand why one needs to understand who they are dealing with.